Legal Opinion

In Re Phipps

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Did the sheriff make a valid levy upon the $210 currency in 'the hands of the clerk ?

If the levy made by the sheriff was valid, the money in contemplation of the law, belonged to the judgment creditor instead of to Fields, and consequently the amount tendered by Fields as an advance bid was wholly insufficient for such purpose. Upon the other hand, if the levy was insufficient and invalid, the clerk still holds the money for Fields and is entitled to have the same used as an advance bid and thus procure a resale of the property. The term “levy” was first defined by Pearson, J., in Bland v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clifton v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Perry v. . HardisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Long v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Bland v. . WhitfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  5. Mann v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ivester v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
  2. Clifton v. . OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Voehringer v. . PollockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Stray Horn v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Strayhorn v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API