Legal Opinion

Ammerman, Paul v. Seaman

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 27, 2021No. 3:17-cv-00800Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PAUL D. AMMERMAN, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 17-cv-800-wmc NURSE SEAMAN, Defendant. This court granted pro se plaintiff Paul D. Ammerman leave to proceed on Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Mary Seaman under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs during a blood pressure check on May 5, 2017. (Dkt. #23.) Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment (dkt. #35) and plaintiff’s subsequent motions for sanctions (dkt. ##42, 47). For the following reasons, the court…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API