Legal Opinion

State v. Oatman

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 22, 2015No. 2014AP2084-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCane, J.

¶ 1. Christopher Oatman appeals a judgment of conviction for eight counts of intentional photographing of a minor by a registered sex offender *246without consent, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.14.1 Oatman argues the statute is both unconstitutional as applied and on its face due to overbreadth. Because § 948.14 is unconstitutionally overbroad, we reverse in part and remand with directions to dismiss all such charges against Oatman.2

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. According to the criminal complaint, Oatman photographed or video recorded multiple children playing outside his home. The complaint does not allege…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

State v. ReichlingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019