Legal Opinion

Rohrer v. Babcock

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1899No. Sac. No. 490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County and from an order denying a new trial. J. S. Beard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion..

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

—This action was brought to obtain a judgment decreeing the estate of John B. Rohrer, deceased, to be the owner of certain hay, and plaintiff to be entitled to the possession thereof. Plaintiff also prayed for and obtained a temporary injunction restraining all interference with said hay pending judgment herein. An appeal was heretofore taken from an order refusing to dissolve said injunction, and said order was affirmed. (Rohrer v. Babcock, 114 Cal. 124.) Thereafter the ease was tried before the court without a jury, the plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appeals from the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baughman v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Crocker v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Rohrer v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Conolley v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Merchants' State Bank v. Sawyer Farmers' Co-operative Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API