Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), rendered March 28, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In 1992 the defendant lured two young neighbors, ages 8 and 11, to his basement by offering to play video games with them. After establishing a friendship with them, he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. AngeloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. People v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BlackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. BogertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. PradoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API