Legal Opinion

United States v. Detente

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 24, 1952No. 10557_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant and one Armando Piemonte were charged in Count 1 of the indictment with possession of counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes, with knowledge they were counterfeit, and with intent to pass them; in Counts 2 and 3 with the sale of such counterfeit notes; and in Count 4 with conspiracy to commit the offenses set forth in the preceding counts. During the trial Piemonte entered a plea of guilty on all counts, but when sworn as a witness emphatically denied that he had conspired with Detente and testified that defendant had no knowledge that Piemonte was dealing in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BucurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. Carengella. United States v. Di VitoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. United States v. LitbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Nicholas GuidoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. Charles Henry Carlson and Dominick Bonomo. Dominick BonomoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. James Cromwell BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. James Bell YagerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. Ernest Jefferson WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API