Legal Opinion
Leal v. Terbush
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Oakland. (Stickney J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The argument in this case was mainly upon the construction of a devise and whether parol evidence was admissible to aid in the construction. It appears that in March, 1873, Joel Craft, who was then husband to the defendant, made his last will which contains the following clause:
“After the payment of my just debts and funeral expenses I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved wife, Mary Jane Craft, all my real estate, and all my personal property of whatever nature or kind; also all moneys and credits I give and bequeath to my beloved wife; and in case of her death, then all my real and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Masson v. BovetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Codman v. JenkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Putnam v. WestcottNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- D'Utricht v. MelchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1789
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Decker v. SchulzeWashington Supreme Court · 1895