Legal Opinion

United States v. Mack J. Bryant

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 11, 1969No. 22511_1PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge.

In this case we hold that appellant’s conviction for assault with intent to commit rape (in violation of D.C.Code § 22-501) must be reversed because the trial judge failed to instruct the jury on the need for corroboration of the testimony of the victim on the elements of the sex offense. However, both the evidence and the findings of the jury plainly support a conviction for assault, and in the interest of justice we do not require a new trial but remand to the district court to determine, after hearing from counsel, whether to enter judgment and sentence for assault…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Ewing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. Hilton Benn, Jr., United States of America v. James W. HuntCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. James O. Gambrill, United States of America v. Jerry L. HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Charles ComerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Burnis Bryant, United States of America v. Henry Church BryantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API