Legal Opinion

American Casualty Co. of Reading, PA. v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Welfare Fund

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1995No. 24290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*592OPINION

2Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether respondents were entitled to indemnification under an insurance policy issued by appellant American Casualty (American) for a judgment respondents were required to pay when they breached a contract. The parties stipulated that Illinois law governs this case since both the insurer and insured are domiciled in Illinois, and since the contract was negotiated and consummated there. See M & R Inv. Co., Inc. v. Fitzsimmons, 484 F. Supp. 1041 (D. Nev. 1980), aff’d, 685 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1982).

FACTS

Respondent, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Butler v. BogdanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Tore, Ltd. v. ChurchNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. M & R Inv. Co., Inc. v. FitzsimmonsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1980

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Casualty Co. v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Welfare FundNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. May Department Stores Co v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. May Dept. Stores Co. v. Federal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API