Legal Opinion
United States v. Kent J. Brummels
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 4, 1994No. 93-2158PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Kent Brummels pleaded guilty to violating 21 U.S.C. § 610(a) (1988), which prohibits the adulteration of meat capable for use as human food. Brummels appeals the district court’s 1 determination that the conduct to which he pleaded guilty qualified as a felony under 21 U.S.C. § 676(a) (1988). Because we hold that the district court’s factual determination that Brummels had substantive quality-control duties in his role as quality control supervisor is not clearly erroneous and because we interpret “distribution” to include acts of meat adulteration by a supervisor in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Act Up!/Portland v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Steven Curtis McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Pummill v. Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale (In Re Richards & Conover Steel, Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Javier Dario GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Darryl HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- White v. Coors Distributing Co. (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.