Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.

This case was first assigned to Cox, P. J., and he has prepared a statement of the case and an opinion disposing of the question of whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. There is division, however, on the question of whether plaintiff made a case to go to the jury on the humanitarian doctrine. We have adopted that portion of the opinion prepared by Cox, P. J., which disposes of the contributory negligence feature; it is as follows:

I. “Action for damages for the death of the wife of plaintiff caused by a train of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steele v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  2. Tannehill v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Behen v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Graefe v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Anderson v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Toups v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API