Legal Opinion

Oorah, Inc. v. Covista Communications, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 2017No. 652316/11 3761 3760PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered September 1, 2016, awarding a sum of money to defendant, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment on its breach of contract counterclaim denied, and plaintiff’s motion for sum mary judgment dismissing the counterclaim granted. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 23, 2016, deciding the parties’ motions, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Defendant counterclaimed for breach of the provision of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oorah, Inc. v. Kane Kessler, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Pate v. BNY Mellon-Alcentra Mezzanine III, LPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API