Legal Opinion
(PC) Jace v. Lirones
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 7, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00419Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL JACE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00419-ADA-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT 14 MARGARET LIRONES, et al., (Doc. 57) 15 Defendants. ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY 16 21-Day Deadline 17 18 19 Plaintiff Michael Jace is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 20 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation 21 claim against Defendant Peterson. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 On…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.