Legal Opinion
Payne v. City of Miami
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 8, 2010No. 3D06-1799PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Balbino Investments, LLC’s Motions for Rehearing
ROTHENBERG, J.
The City of Miami (“City”) and Balbino Investments, LLC (“Balbino”) filed motions for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc. The City subsequently withdrew its motions. Balbino’s Motion for Rehearing is denied. We, however, withdraw this Court’s opinion issued on August 8, 2007, and issue the following opinion in its stead to address the dissenting opinion to the denial of the Motion for Rehearing En Banc.
Balbino owns a parcel of land located on the north side of the Miami River at approximately N.W. 18th Avenue, Miami, Florida, and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin County v. YusemSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Payne v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Coastal Development of North Florida, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Jacksonville Beach v. COASTAL DEVELOPMENTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Payne v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- McAlpin v. Criminal Justice Standards & Training CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Durham Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Mdxq v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Padron v. State, Department of Environmental ProtectionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014