Legal Opinion
Bartley v. Accu-Glo Electric Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated May 17, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and upon searching the record, summary judgment is granted to the defendants dismissing the cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).
While the injured plaintiff was standing on level ground,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Jacome v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- QDR Consultants & Development Corp. v. Colonia InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Preferred Mortgage Brokers, Inc. v. ByfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Eddy v. John Hummel Custom Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Kobetitsch v. P.M. MaintenanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003