Nisr v. Barakat
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Affirmed. See C.J. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 9 So.3d 750, 755 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (holding that when an issue is tried by implied consent, due process concerns are alleviated; noting that “[ijmplied consent arises when arguments and evidence are presented on the issue without objection by the opposing party”); Foerster v. Foerster, 885 So.2d 927, 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (“Florida courts have repeatedly held that it is a violation of a parent’s due process rights for a court to modify visitation in a final judgment unless the *213issue of modification is properly presented to it by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- C.J. v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Todaro v. TodaroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Brickell Station Towers, Inc. v. JDC (America) Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- NICOLE KRAUS v. THOMAS KRAUSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022