Aburto v. Thornton
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION DANIELLE L. ABURTO and ) CARLOS ABURTO, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CAUSE NO.: 2:23-CV-375-TLS-JEM ) PATRICK THORNTON and ) MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court sua sponte. The Court must continuously police its subject matter jurisdiction, and remand a removed action over which the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Smart v. Local 702 International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Tommy Morris v. Salvatore NuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Tammy Howell, a Minor, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Charles Goerdt v. Tribune Entertainment Company and Abc Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.