Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Holder

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 28, 1950No. 37,811PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was a claim by two attorneys for fees and by three additional parties for services and expenses incurred in a hearing on the application of an incompetent person to be declared restored.

There were two claims for attorney fees, two claims by doctors and one claim by the Wichita Guidance Center. They were all allowed by the probate court and on appeal by the district court. The guardian has appealed.

There is not much dispute about the facts. Anna C. Holder was adjudged incompetent in the probate court on December 9, 1946. On October 25,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sheneman v. ManringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Nichols, Nichols & Milroy v. SchulteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Estate of Holder v. JochemsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flessas v. Marine National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  3. In Re the Conservatorship & Guardianship of PulverNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Correll v. HammSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Hale v. GravalleseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API