Legal Opinion

Platt v. Finck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by Bichard W. Elliott, the purchaser at a sale held pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure entered in the above-entitled action, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 21st day of January, 1901, denying his motion to be relieved from his purchase.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The purchaser presents two objections to the title. The first is as to the sufficiency of a power of attorney executed by Harry M. Kaplan and Annie Kaplan, his wife, which authorized the attorney in fact to sell, convey, transfer, lease, mortgage, and in any and every other method, “ deemed by our attorney advisable, dispose of, manage and encumber any and all of my real or personal property and estate in the City, County and State of New York, and to give and grant in our names good and sufficient deeds and leases therefor ; and such conveyances, assignments, leases, mortgages…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. . ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. FallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Carney v. MorrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Taylor v. EmmetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Roy v. Harrison Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Gruner v. Ruffner, New York County Courts1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API