Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Renee Roth, S.) entered May 12, 1994, which denied the motion of objectants Seth, Joy and Stanley Grossman to quash a subpoena; directed objectants’ attorneys to produce documents to attorneys for the executor-petitioner; and directed oral examination of two of objectants’ attorneys, Lester Tanner and Mitchell Lapidus, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion granted.

Order of the same court and Surrogate, entered June 23, 1994, which denied a motion by said objectants to compel oral examination of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Aronson v. CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re the Estate of SageNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  4. Match v. MatchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of DormanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API