Hubbard v. Territory
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oltla. T. Error from Probate Court, Grant County; before A. C. Glenn, Judge. A. E. Hubbard was conivcted of crime, and brings error. On July 24, 1905, there was filed in this cause in the probate court of Grant county, Oklahoma Territory, the following information : “Territory of Oklahoma v. Bert Hubbard. “Information.
Read the full summary
Oltla. T. Error from Probate Court, Grant County; before A. C. Glenn, Judge. A. E. Hubbard was conivcted of crime, and brings error. On July 24, 1905, there was filed in this cause in the probate court of Grant county, Oklahoma Territory, the following information : “Territory of Oklahoma v. Bert Hubbard. “Information. “I, the undersigned, county attorney of said county, in the name, by the authority, and on behalf of the territory of Oklahoma, give information that on the 22d day of July, A. D. 1905, in said county of Grant and territory of Oklahoma, one Bert Hubbard did then and there…
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
(after stating the facts as above). Plaintiff in eiror insist, among other assignments of error, that “the court erred in permitting defendant in error to amend the information after the case was closed and to charge another distinct ofEense.” The offense charged in the information, before amendment, is defined in an act approved March 13, 1905 (Sess. Laws 1905, p.-196, c. 13), which reads: Section 1:
“If any person shall orally or otherwise, falsely and maliciously or falsely and wantonly impute to any female in this territory, married or unmarried, a want of chastity, he shall be deemed…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Stone v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Vaughn v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015