Bluth v. Tax Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
¶1 Appellants argue the trial court erred in granting Appellee's Motion to Dismiss. The trial court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because the Utah State Tax Commission (Commission) did not have an opportunity to decide the matter prior to Appellants filing suit in district court. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
¶2 Pursuant to authority granted under Utah Code Ann. §§ 59-1-210, -12-118 (2000), the Commission has promulgated rules relating to provisions of the Sales and Use Tax Act (Sales Tax Act). See Utah Code Ann. §§ 59-12-101 to -1802 (2000). Acting pursuant to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walker Bank & Trust Company v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1964
- Thatcher v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Property Tax Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Brumley v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Schwenke v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Patterson v. American Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Bluth v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2002