Legal Opinion
Pacific Coast Engineering Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1970No. Civ. 26032PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGEE, J.
Plaintiff manufactures and fabricates various steel products at its plant in Alameda. The nine insurance companies who are the defendants herein issued policies of insurance covering plaintiff for loss sustained by fire and explosion. Attached to each of the nine policies is an identical endorsement entitled “Business Interruption Form No. 8,” hereafter referred to as “Form No. 8.”
Plaintiff contracted to construct a steel barge to be delivered at its plant on March 19, 1964, for towage to Seattle. On this date, with less than one hour’s work remaining to complete and deliver it…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Zurich American Insurance v. Coeur Rochester, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2010
- Buxbaum v. Aetna Life and Casualty CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ramada Inn Ramogreen, Inc., D/B/A 1800 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Keetch v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Steel Products Co., Inc. v. Millers National Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.