Legal Opinion

Luney v. Rollins

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 25, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Crawford District Court. — E. G. Albert, Judge. Action to quiet title. Decree in favor of defendants James and Emma Coleman Rollins. Plaintiffs appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtSteveNS, J.

This is an action to quiet title to Lot 1, Block 139, in the city of Denison. Martha Smyth died intestate, May 30,1888, without issue, survived by her husband, Samuel Smyth, and seized in fee of the above-described real estate. She was also survived by two brothers, John and James Rollins, so that title to the property passed, one half to Samuel Smyth, her husband, and one fourth to each of her brothers. The defendant Emma Coleman Rollins is the wife of James Rollins. Plaintiffs are distant relatives of Samuel Smyth’s, and base their claim of ownership upon a warranty deed from him, executed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Burns v. ByrneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Goulding v. ShonquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Bader v. DyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Ratigan v. RatiganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Killmer v. WuchnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shives v. NiewoehnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Arends v. FrerichsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API