Legal Opinion

Manrique v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 22, 2008No. A-9461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEWART, Judge.

A jury convicted Jose G. Manrique of first-degree sexual assault and first-degree burglary. 1 Manrique claims that the superior court erroneously denied his motion for a new trial; Manrique contended that he did not receive a fair trial because two jurors were biased. We reject Manrique’s claim as to one juror, but conclude that Manrique is entitled to a hearing regarding the other.

Manrique also argues that the superior court improperly failed to refer his case to the three-judge sentencing panel. We address this issue and reject it. The record supports the superior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas J. Hard v. Burlington Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. West v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lloyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  4. Swain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  5. Fickes v. Petrolane-Alaska Gas Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grundy v. DhillonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Liddicoat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  4. Sawyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
  5. Knipe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API