Manrique v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
A jury convicted Jose G. Manrique of first-degree sexual assault and first-degree burglary. 1 Manrique claims that the superior court erroneously denied his motion for a new trial; Manrique contended that he did not receive a fair trial because two jurors were biased. We reject Manrique’s claim as to one juror, but conclude that Manrique is entitled to a hearing regarding the other.
Manrique also argues that the superior court improperly failed to refer his case to the three-judge sentencing panel. We address this issue and reject it. The record supports the superior…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas J. Hard v. Burlington Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- West v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Lloyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Swain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Fickes v. Petrolane-Alaska Gas Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grundy v. DhillonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Liddicoat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Sawyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- Knipe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.