Legal Opinion

Donahue v. R. C. Mahon Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1971No. Appeals, 1662 and 1668PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit in which plaintiff Neuman Donahue, individually and trading as Armstrong & Donahue (Donahue), recovered a jury verdict in the sum of $52,072.57, plus interest of $3,905.44, against the defendant, B. C. Mahon Company (Mahon). The action was commenced in foreign attachment but the attachment was dissolved before trial. The amount of the verdict was determined after allowing as a credit a counterclaim asserted by Mahon in the agreed amount of $6,506.34. Mahon filed motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial. The motion for judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Easton v. Washington County InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Pellegrene v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Becker v. Borough of Schuylkill HavenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Margaret M. Blair v. The Manhattan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Spagnol Enterprises, Inc. v. Penn Lear Development Corp. (In Re Spagnol Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Acchione & Canuso, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Margaret M. Blair v. The Manhattan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API