Commonwealth v. Grundy
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence of cars found in a “chop shop.” We reverse.
¶ 2 For several weeks, the police were aware of a pattern of theft and later stripping of cars in the Frankford area of Philadelphia. A number of cars, stripped of hoods, doors, etc., had been found in a two-block radius of the 4800 block of Mulberry Street. Two days after the latest stripped car was found, the police received a complaint that a white Nissan Maxima was stolen. This car had a LoJack anti-theft device that emitted a signal which could…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Murdaugh v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ViallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. RamosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. GrundySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004