Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grundy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence of cars found in a “chop shop.” We reverse.

¶ 2 For several weeks, the police were aware of a pattern of theft and later stripping of cars in the Frankford area of Philadelphia. A number of cars, stripped of hoods, doors, etc., had been found in a two-block radius of the 4800 block of Mulberry Street. Two days after the latest stripped car was found, the police received a complaint that a white Nissan Maxima was stolen. This car had a LoJack anti-theft device that emitted a signal which could…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Murdaugh v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ViallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. RamosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. GrundySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API