Legal Opinion

United States Casualty Co. v. Drew

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1925No. 4550PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Error is assigned to the order of the court below overruling the demurrer to the complaint. It is contended that from the complaint it appears that one of the conditions of the policy was that the insured should make no settlement of any claim arising thereunder without the written consent' of the company, and that the complaint shows that before liability under the policy was denied by the insurance company the defendant in error executed his note in payment of the judgment. Reference is made to the specific allegations of the complaint, “that on or about…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. of Columbus v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  2. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. American Surety Co. v. SutherlandDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1940
  4. Mason v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1940
  5. W. J. Kiely & Co. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API