Legal Opinion

People v. Pilgrim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

Mollen, P. J.

On this appeal, the defendant challenges the validity of two narcotics convictions. He contends that those convictions must be overturned as a consequence of the fact that, in several prior criminal proceedings, he was represented by a layman who falsely represented himself as an attorney at law.

In 1972, the defendant was the subject of three separate Nassau County indictments and of three additional accusatory instruments all filed in Nassau County. Repre*462sented by one Albert Silver, the defendant entered guilty pleas to two felony narcotics offenses and two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Loper v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. PilgrimNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. PilgrimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. CabassaNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API