Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Dolan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1997No. 2-96-0076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (155 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)), plaintiff Daniel Douglass and plaintiff-intervenor Edward J. Domalik appeal the trial court’s order granting the separate summary judgment motions of defendants Barbara Peterson and Thomas and Karen Durnan (the Durnans). We affirm.

On May 5, 1993, Douglass was injured when "Lady,” a horse which had escaped from her pasture and was running at large, collided with his motorcycle. Douglass filed a complaint against Peterson, the Durnans, and Michael Dolan, Janet Dolan, and Carol Dolan (the Dolans). Domalik, a passenger on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Barber-Colman Co. v. A & K Midwest Insulation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Heyen v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Bulpit v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Lewis v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corona v. MalmAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Boswell Memorial Hospital v. BongiornoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Boswell Memorial Hospital v. BongiornoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Corona v. MalmAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API