Legal Opinion

State v. Horton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 19, 1913PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — lion. Ralph 8. Latshaw, Judge. (1) The verdict of the jury was against the evidence and should be set aside. Under the evidence the verdict indicated that the jury were actuated by bias and prejudice against defendant. (2) The court erred in not sustaining defendant’s objections to the testimony of Dr. Stone, who examined the defendant and testified as to his findings.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — lion. Ralph 8. Latshaw, Judge. (1) The verdict of the jury was against the evidence and should be set aside. Under the evidence the verdict indicated that the jury were actuated by bias and prejudice against defendant. (2) The court erred in not sustaining defendant’s objections to the testimony of Dr. Stone, who examined the defendant and testified as to his findings. State v. Newcomb, 220 Mo. 65; Constitution, art. 2, sec. 23. (3) The verdict is against the evidence and against the weight of the evidence. Johnson v. State, 17 Ohio, 593; ITornbeck v.…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

Tried in the criminal court of Jackson county, defendant was convicted of rape, and Rape. appeals from a judgment of that court sentencing bim to a term of twenty-five years in the State penitentiary.

Defendant (colored) was a school teacher in Kansas City, Missouri, and was charged with ravishing Callie Cason, one of his pupils, of the age of eleven years.

The testimony of the prosecutrix is to the effect that when school adjourned'for the noon hour on May *660_ Th© Facts. 25, 1911, the defendant requested her to re-7. 7 x main and pour some water on Ms hands; that, after the other pupils had left…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ConwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. State v. GoodaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. State v. NewcombSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. State v. TeeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. State v. DarlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. State v. TiedtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. State v. SelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. State v. CramOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API