In re Elrheihem T.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that petitioner met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that respondent committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of petit larceny (see, Family Ct Act § 342.2 [2]; Penal Law § 155.25). The conflicting testimony of the witnesses presented an issue of credibility for Family Court to resolve (see, Matter of Jerry XX., 115 AD2d 797, lv denied 68 NY2d 601; Matter of Michael D., 109 AD2d 633, 634, affd 66 NY2d 843). Additionally, we conclude that the…