Legal Opinion

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Purifoy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1932No. 6 Div. 263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals shows that, while the circuit court overruled defendant’s objection to the statement made by counsel for plaintiff in argument, no exception was reserved. But it is insisted that nevertheless it was proper ground for sustaining a motion for a new trial. When no exception is reserved to the ruling on defendant’s objection to argument, it is good ground for a new trial only when the ■“remarks [of counsel] are of such a character that neither rebuke nor retraction can entirely destroy their sinister influence.” Birmingham Ry., L. & P. Co. v. Gonzalez, 183 Ala.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Birmingham Electric Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. American Standard Life Ins. Co. v. TolliverAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API