Legal Opinion

United States v. Cavanaugh

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided December 18, 2009No. 1:09-mj-00004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT

RALPH R. ERICKSON, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Roman Cavanaugh, Jr.’s motion to dismiss the indictment. Cavanaugh raises three issues: (1) the indictment is fatally defective for failure to list an essential element of the offense; (2) Section 117(a) of Title 18, United States Code, is unconstitutional as it exceeds Congress’s power; and (3) Section 117(a) of Title 18, United States Code, violates the United States Constitution by permitting the use of uncounseled tribal court convictions to be offered as substantive evidence to prove an…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ShavanauxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. CavanaughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. KirkaldieDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014
  4. United States v. CavanaughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API