Huddleston v. Fergeson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
At the instance of purchaser, the trial court, concluding that seller had breached an unconsummated contract for the sale of realty, decreed that purchaser recover the escrow deposit. The conclusion is grounded on findings that seller was unable to convey the title contracted for and to deliver possession of the realty. The evidence fails to establish a breach in either particular alleged and found. Reversed and rendered.
By a written contract executed 9 December 1975, A. L. Huddleston agreed to sell, and Mildred Fergeson agreed to purchase, the “North one-half (NVá), Section…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Starr v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Hobbs Trailers v. JT Arnett Grain Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Whitehead v. FoleyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Lieber v. NicholsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
- Rogers v. RogersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dare v. SobuleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Entzminger v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Weingarten Realty Investors v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Payne v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Magnetic Copy Services, Inc. v. Seismic Specialists, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.