Legal Opinion

United States v. King

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1988No. 88-21-01-CR-5PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WALLACE W. DIXON, United States Magistrate.

This matter is before me on omnibus motions filed by the defendant, Claudius W. King, within the time set by the court’s pre-trial scheduling order, having been referred for ruling by Judge Boyle. The government’s response time as allowed in the pre-trial scheduling order has run but there have been no timely responses. Thus, these motions are ripe for disposition.

Defendant stands charged in five counts of a seven-count superceding indictment with violations stemming from a series of alleged controlled substances violations during the period…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. William N. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
  2. Plotkin v. Association of Eye Care Centers, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API