Legal Opinion

Kelsch v. Miller

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1944No. File No. 6899Published

1OpinionChristianson, J.

(On petition for rehearing) Plaintiff has petitioned for a rehearing. It is asserted that there was no authority to include in the notice of expiration of the period of redemption more than one tax certificate, and that the inclusion of the two certificates rendered the notice invalid. The remainder of the petition seeks to raise and present for determination certain questions that were not’ raised in the trial court or in the oral argument or brief on appeal, but are sought to be raised for the first time in the petition for rehearing. So far as the petition for rehearing re-argues questions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Enderlin v. Pontiac TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ugland v. Farmers & Merchants' State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lindberg v. BurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Funderburg v. YoungNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Movius v. PropperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API