Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority v. Cleban

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1970No. Appeal, No. 215PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

A Case Stated in Assumpsit was filed in the County Court of Allegheny County (now Common Pleas) to determine whether or not the Urban Redevelopment Authority was entitled to collect rent from Martin Cleban and Ray Cleban, his wife, trading as Blue Ribbon Fruit Market, for the use and occupancy after condemnation of premises located at 6201 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, from July 16,1966 until May 17,1967. In an amendment to the Case Stated the parties agreed that $162.50 was a fair monthly value if rent was found due and owing. The matter was placed on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Washington Square Urban Renewal Area Condemnation, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. A Condemnation Proceeding in Rem by the Redevelopment Authority of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. 21.1 Acres of LandCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Lectronic Distributors, Inc. v. Redevelopment AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Nanticoke Public Service Co. v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Hay v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API