Legal Opinion

MUSONDA v. STATE

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 2019No. F-2016-988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPEARANCES AT TRIAL, LARRY EDWARDS, ATTORNEY AT LAW, 601 S. BOULDER, STE. 1305, TULSA, OK 74119, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

ANDREA BROWN, KATIE KOLJACK, ASST. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, 500 S. DENVER, STE. 900, TULSA, OK 74013, COUNSEL FOR THE STATE

APPEARANCES ON APPEAL, NEAL B. KIRKPATRICK, 2021 S. LEWIS, STE. 335, TULSA, OK 74104, COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

MIKE HUNTER, OKLA. ATTORNEY GENERAL, WILLIAM R. HOLMES, ASST. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 313 N.E. 21ST STREET, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105, COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE

SUMMARY OPINION

HUDSON, JUDGE:

*695 ¶1 Appellant, Lubuto Musonda, was tried by a jury and convicted in Tulsa…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Nauni v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. BRAMLETT v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Ellison v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SHAW v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
  2. MUSONDA v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
  3. IN RE REVISION OF PORTION OF RULES OF COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API