Zuckerbrod v. 355 Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the de*676fendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Elaine Zuckerbrod (hereinafter the appellant) based on, among other things, the business judgment rule. The business judgment rule “bars ‘judicial inquiry into actions of corporate directors taken in good faith and in the exercise of honest judgment in the lawful and legitimate furtherance of corporate purposes’ ” (North Fork Preserve, Inc. v Kaplan, 68 AD3d 732, 733 [2009], quoting Auerbach v Bennett, 47 NY2d 619, 629 [1979]).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Tzolis v. WolffNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Buchinger v. Jazz Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Mizrahi v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- North Fork Preserve, Inc. v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mobarak v. MowadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Katz v. BeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Jacobs v. CartalemiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Jacobs v. Westchester Industrial Complex, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Mobarak v. MowadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.