In re the Claim of Fronczak
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Claimant was hired to perform address canvassing for the United States Census. After four days of training, claimant resigned, informing the employer that he did not think he could perform the job because he had “an electrolyte problem” and needed to urinate frequently. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. Although claimant maintains that he was unable to perform the job based upon physical limitations caused by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of Dixon-WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of KubiakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of DePuyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of PerroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of SheldonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006