Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Fronczak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 4, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

Claimant was hired to perform address canvassing for the United States Census. After four days of training, claimant resigned, informing the employer that he did not think he could perform the job because he had “an electrolyte problem” and needed to urinate frequently. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. Although claimant maintains that he was unable to perform the job based upon physical limitations caused by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of Dixon-WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of KubiakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of DePuyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. In re the Claim of PerroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. In re the Claim of SheldonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API