Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 22, 1968No. 24528PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Justice.

The question for decision here is whether the Judge of Tattnall Superior Court erred in remanding the appellant to the custody of the respondent and in refusing to discharge him upon the hearing held pursuant to the prior issuance of the writ of habeas corpus. The appellant contended in his habeas corpus petition that his conviction of the offense of murder was illegal and void because it resulted, in part at least, from the admission in evidence of a confession or admission which was not voluntary in that it was made by the defendant at a time when he was not represented by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Mobley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Massey v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Clark v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  3. Charlie Mobley, Jr. v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Ga., No. 31146 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Charlie Mobley, Jr. v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API