Legal Opinion

Creecy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 14, 1885No. 71Published

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The nature of the motion and the facts involved are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtNott, J.

On the 1st June last, and during the present term, the court rendered a decision on the merits in this case, and among others found the following fact:

“ Frances A. Roberts, the widow of Charles M. Roberts, assigned November 8, 1882, all of her right, title, and interest in the patent to the claimant, Charles E. Creecy, and he is likewise the administrator of L. R. Burr, one of the original licensees ) but it does not appear that the legal representative of the estate of Charles M. Roberts has ever assigned the license acquired by Roberts to the claimant, and the court finds that *4the damages…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1878
  2. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API