Legal Opinion

Hale v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 18, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*836Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

The appellant, Mary E. Hale, a colored woman, claiming that she was subjected to insults and indignities at ’■¡he hands of a drunken white passenger, who came into the colored compartment where she was seated, brought this action against appellee, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, to recover damages. At the conclusion of the testimony the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the railway company. To review the propriety of that ruling, this appeal is prosecuted.

Appellee owns and operates a line of railway from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Louisville & Nashville R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Renfro's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Wood v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BakerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. TwichellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API