Legal Opinion

Howell v. Miller

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1928No. 26925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The record in this case does not contain an appeal bond, but on the record is a notation of Boulton, clerk of the circuit court: Cost of transcript, thirty dollars and forty-five cents,.paid by appellants; twenty dollars deposited with, the clerk of the supreme court.

Section 24, Hemingway’s Code of 1927 (section 49', Code of 1906), provides for appeal bond to be given in the sum of five hundred dollars, conditioned for payment of all costs of appeal in case the judgment or decree be affirmed as to such appellant; but, if appellant prepays the cost of the transcript, bond for the sum of one…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snipes v. Commercial & Industrial BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Gericevich v. BonhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API