Eastside Properties v. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Judge.
Eastside Properties brought an inverse condemnation action against the Georgia Department of Transportation (DOT), claiming that the DOT’s construction of certain traffic control devices which diminished access to its property gave rise to a compensable taking. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the DOT, and we affirm.
In reviewing a grant or denial of summary judgment, this Court conducts a de novo review of the evidence. Goring v. Martinez, 224 Ga. App. 137, 138 (2) (479 SE2d 432) (1996). “To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Goring v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Tift County v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Department of Transportation v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phillips v. Key Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Phh Investments v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- State ex rel. King Rd. Holdings, Ltd. v. Lucas Cty. EngineerOhio Court of Appeals · 2026