Legal Opinion

State v. Hodges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1987No. 74148PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

The trial court granted appellees’ motion to suppress evidence, in a proceeding pursuant to OCGA § 17-5-30, after concluding that the investigative stop of appellees was not supported by an articulable suspicion, in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The state appealed. Although Hodges ostensibly relied below on both federal and state constitutional provisions, only the federal ground is involved here.

The search and seizure did not cross Fourth Amendment federal constitutional bounds. The evidence shows that the two police detectives had an articulable suspicion to detain the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. State v. WinnieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Durden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API