Legal Opinion
State v. . Holman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants were indicted for maintaining a public nuisance, produced by the creation of a milldam and the ponding of water thereby upon adjacent lands, etc.
There were two counts in the bill, but as the court directed the jury not to consider the second only the first is set out.
"The jurors for the State, upon their oath, present that John B. Holman and Elizabeth Holman, late of Iredell County, on 1 August, 1889, at and in the county aforesaid, did unlawfully, injuriously, (862) willfully, and knowingly maintain and keep a certain dam across Fifth Creek, in said county, upon land of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Shelby v. Cleveland Mill & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Cline v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- State v. . TillySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1872
- State v. . WolfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adler & Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Jeremy Improvement Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- McLeod v. Miller & LuxNevada Supreme Court · 1917