Legal Opinion

Culver v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1902No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Rush Culver against Eranklyn H. Smith to recover a commission on the purchase of certain lands. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This suit was brought to recover a commission of 25 cents an acre, to which plaintiff claims he was entitled because of the purchase by defendant of a quantity of lands and timber. The case was tried before a jury. The plaintiff obtained judgment. The defendant has brought the case here by writ of error.

It is claimed the contract, as stated in the declaration, is so uncei’tain and indefinite the plaintiff is not entitled to recover upon it. The material portion of the declaration is as follows:

“For that whereas, heretofore, to wit, on the first day of September, 1899, the said defendant was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Jaddatz v. Grace Harbor Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API