Thames Realty Corp. v. Massachusetts Fire & Marine Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAboh Steueb, J.
Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing each of the four causes of action. The undisputed facts are that plaintiff is the owner of a building in Brooklyn. On December 3, 1956 there was an explosion at a pier some distance from plaintiff’s building but which caused some damage to the building. Defendants are insurance companies which *748had issued policies of insurance to plaintiff covering this type of damage. Plaintiff gave notice to defendants and thereupon had a builder survey its building to ascertain the extent of damage. Plaintiff also designated a public adjuster who met with…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Proc v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sager Glove Corporation v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Ramsey v. Home Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Bell v. Quaker City Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.